https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bay-k-8644.ht
75, P less then .001), quantitatively estimated RVol (ICC = 0.74, P less then .001), and 2D PISA TEE (ICC = 0.79, P less then .001). Three-dimensional MR flow quantification agreed better with CMR (ICC = 0.86, P less then .001) than did RVol on 2D PISA TTE (ICC = 0.66, P less then .001) and 2D PISA TEE (ICC = 0.69, P less then .001), with narrower limits of agreement on Bland-Altman analysis. Three-dimensional MR flow quantification had high accuracy for diagnosing severe MR using TEE (area under the curve = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, P
Like
Comment
Share
