https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/CP-690550.htm
3±11.2% and 86.4±6.7%, compared with the untreated implants (68.3±8.8% and 74.8±13%). Micro-computed tomography analyses revealed that healing patterns differed between coronal and apical regions, with higher coronal bone-to-implant contact at week 13. Histopathologic results showed, at week 13, bone healing around the surface-treated implant with undistinguishable defect margins, while the untreated implant still presented bone condensation and traces of the initial drill defect. Our results suggest that the surface-treated implant n
Like
Comment
Share
