https://www.selleckchem.com/EGFR(HER).html
The majority of studies were retrospective and had high or unclear risk of bias. BBB disruption was measured with consistent methodology in CT studies, whereas in MR studies, there was more variability. All CT studies provided a BBB disruption cutoff predictive of HT. Four CT and 10 MR studies were included in the quantitative analysis. We found that BBB disruption was associated with HT with both CT (OR = 3.42; 95%CI = 1.62-7.23) and MR (OR = 9.34; 95%CI = 3.16-27.59). There was a likely publication bias particularly for MR studies. Conclusio
Like
Comment
Share
