https://www.selleckchem.com/JAK.html
0001). The difference in suspicion level between EFVPTC and NIFTP is not statistically significant. None of the cases of NIFTP in the study had a high suspicion level. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrates that cytology interpreted in the context of ACR TI-RADS suspicion levels can separate NIFTP from many IFVPTC and a few EFVPTC with overt invasion. PTC could be diagnosed in cytology if cells with papillary-like nuclear features derived from TR5 nodules. The nodules with TR4 or less that yield similar cells require surgical pathology to diagnose FVPTC
Like
Comment
Share
