https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/usp25-28-inhi
The crude diagnostic agreement was 93% with a kappa = 85% (agreement adjusted by chance) between methods. If a 10% increase in the relative volume difference between the arms was used as the diagnostic criterion, prevalence was 20% (9/46) and 22% (10/46), respectively. Conclusion There is good agreement between perometry and circumferential girth measurements when classifying patients as having a difference between arm volumes 200 mL or 10%, the most frequently used cutoffs to diagnose lymphedema.Background and Object
Like
Comment
Share
