https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bgj398-nvp-bg
603-0.797] compared with an area under the curve of EF of 0.615 (95% CI 0.514-0.716) (P = 0.059 for difference). The total absolute deviation between predicted and observed outcome frequencies obtained by calibration plots were 13.8% for EF compared with only 6.4% for GLS. Best results of ROC analysis (area under the curve = 0.759; P = 0.06), calibration and goodness-of-fit (χ = 28.34, P ≤ 0.0001, = 0.25) were achieved for GLS added to a baseline model consisting of known cardiovascular risk factors in a multivariate regress
Like
Comment
Share
