https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/alofanib-rpt8
The median of the energy produced in stance was superior with CAFO (+2.2 J/kg, IQR 4.7, P=0.006), and the energy absorbed inferior (-3.3 J/kg, IQR 4.3, P=0.011). No statistically significant difference was found for any other parameter. Preference of the children was equally distributed between the two orthoses. No evident superiority of CAFO with respect to HAFO was found in improving gait performance of children with CP and crouch gait. Nevertheless, the results suggest the possibility that CAFO permits an energy saving and re
Like
Comment
Share
