https://www.selleckchem.com/
08 ± 2.51mm , M-15.42 ± 3.47mm , D-16.09 ± 3.97mm ) were non-significant differences. They were significantly less than the decline in the control group (C-45.04 ± 8.38mm M-31.98 ± 8.34mm , D-31.85 ± 8.52mm ) (P 0.05). The percentage of newly formed bone in the CGFs/DBBM group (41.99 ± 12.99%) was significantly greater than that in DBBM group (30.68 ± 10.95%) (P 0.05). The percentage of residual materials in the CGFs/DBBM group (16.19 ± 6.63%) was significantly less than that in the DBBM group (28.35 ± 11.70%) (P 0.05). Combined application o