https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/ono-ae3-208.h
Results Mean (SD) procedure time was 183.0 (56.1) s with and 206.8 (56.2) s without needle tip tracking (p=0.16). There were no significant differences in any of the secondary outcomes. Two volunteers' experienced Horner syndrome after blocks without needle tip tracking. No other adverse events occurred during the study. Conclusion Our study on needle tip tracking for infraclavicular blocks did not reveal any significant differences between active needle tip tracking and the control procedures, neither for primary outcome nor second