https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/fasoracetam-n
Merker et al. argue that integrated information theory (IIT) is not a theory of consciousness because the IIT formalism does not match phenomenology. I argue that the authors ultimately fail to articulate the problem of the inference of the postulates from the axioms. I suggest a different version of this problem, and argue that this can help rethink IIT's potential for consciousness science.The integrated information theory (IIT) equates levels of consciousness with the amount of information integrated over the elements that